Mr Abbott speaks at a carbon tax debate in Brisbane, July 2011
Mr Abbott is clearly utterly unsuitable to be Prime Minister. This obvious fact won’t stop Australia voting Ms Gillard out in September.
If I’m right, a weak, flailing, out of his depth PM will start wondering what he’s doing. What moves should we make NOW to get ready?
2012 was a good year. I found out what it’s like to have an amazing, intense, intellectual friend wife for me while I went and worked full time.
I’ve marshalled the money effectively – for me the only point in working these long hours is to get materially ahead – and I’m glad to be able to point to concrete gains I’ve got by spending money well. This has been my most emotionally and financially prosperous year ever.
Also, I LOVED going shooting, and Sydney friends, remember lunch on Wed Jan 30 – the plane tickets are all paid for!
I’ve improved my mental and physical fitness, but I have a long way to go there. Keep on pushing.
It’s not just money I’m marshalling, but plans. Plans for political infrastructure to help small groups, plans to get on radio again with a tight show focussing on local music, plans to make content AND have a day job. My fitness MUST improve for this to be possible, and these plans will take two or three years. But I can see how they can happen.
Anyway. 2012 has been full of love and achievement. Thanks. I hope you enjoyed it too.
000 advise fire engines are on the way
Incoming Liberal National Party premier Campbell Newman recently cancelled the Queensland Premiers’ Literary Awards. Many Queensland artists are unhappy about this, and there’s a public forum tomorrow at the Judith Wright Centre in Fortitude Valley to talk about what to do.
The forum has been called by Rachael Jacobs, Greens candidate for Central Ward in the Brisbane City Council elections coming up on April 28 2012.
There’s a Facebook event here, or if you don’t want to use FB you can find the details at this page to let the organisers know you’ll be coming along.
The forum is at the Judith Wright Centre, at 420 Brunswick St, Fortitude Valley, right on the corner of Berwick St. It starts at 4.30pm See below for maps showing where the Judith Wright Centre is, and public transport information. To see larger versions of the maps, click on them and then click again when a new version pops up.
The best way to get to the Judith Wright Centre by public transport is to catch a 196 or 199 bus to Stop 5, Brunswick St, about 20m from the door of the Judith Wright. Or you can catch a train to Fortitude Valley Railway Station and walk a few hundred metres – click here to use Translink’s train journey planner.
A disabled person, who goes by the tumblr name of najalater, wanted to go to discussion panels at the SupaNova Pop Culture Expo in Melbourne, Australia. Her disability is in her hearing; she needs to be able see very clearly so she can lip-read and/or have a translator with her who translates what is going on into Auslan (Australian Sign Language). This means it’s quite difficult for her to get anything out of the panels unless she sits in the front row.
The trouble is that the front row is only available to holders of “VIP Supa-Star” tickets, which cost $680. najalater emailed the Supanova organisers asking if seating in the front row could be arranged for her for the cost of a $30 day pass. The organisers declined to do this.
That led to this post on tumblr by a user called erinkyan – the post was reblogged by najalater herself, confirming the basis of the post. After I saw it on tumblr, I tweeted to the Supanova organisers:
@SupaNovaExpo Sounds a bit rough that you’re making a deaf person who wants to attend pay $650 so she can sit where she can hear the panels
— David Jackmanson (@djackmanson) April 3, 2012
Supanova answered me from their Twitter account the next day:
I responded briefly, thinking they were being a bit callous. But then I received a series of direct messages on Twitter from a person who says they work closely with the Supanova organisers. These messages began badly, stating that:
“Supanova’s words have been twisted by these disabled people”
and continuing on to say:
“I’m afraid these people are actually changing the story to suit their need. It’s gone viral and it’s a lie too.”
EDIT: CLARIFICATION:
These direct messages were not sent by someone with authority to speak on behalf of Supanova; they were NOT sent from the official Supanova account. However the person who sent them claims to have seen the entire email exchange between najalater and Supanova.
END EDIT
I asked how najalater was supposed to have lied. I rechecked the tumblr post that I’d been relying on for information. It says that najalater asked for front row access (normally $680) at the cost of the cheapest ticket ($30). The person confirmed that this is what najalater had asked for.
So I still did not see how najalater had lied, since both sides agree she had asked for the same thing. I asked, and the response was that the original blog post had left out parts of the original email, and that the original email had threatened to report Supanova to a state government disability tribunal.
I then contacted najalater directly and asked if she was willing for me to publish her original email. She immediately replied and said yes. The transcript of the original email she provided me with is here:
To Whom It May Concern,
My name is Naja and I am eager to attend Supanova in Melbourne on Sunday 15th. However, as a hard of hearing person, I am concerned about accessibility in the guest panels. In order to understand and enjoy the panels, it would be ideal for me and my interpreter to be seated near the front of the audience (or anywhere with close visual and audio access to the speakers). Unfortunately, I noticed that the only form of ticket available on the main website that gives optimal access to panels is a full weekend pass for $685, which is not really feasible for my interpreter and I, especially when we are only able to attend one day and panel access aspect of the VIP pass we are interested in. Both of us are more than happy to purchase our own day tickets, as we are both fans and are eager to participate in Supanova. However I feel that without guaranteed disability access to panels, attending may not be worthwhile. If close panel access could possibly be available for disability reasons, I would be absolutely delighted by the opportunity to attend and enjoy Supanova.
Regards,
Supanova have also used their Twitter account to explain to Naja directly why they think their setup is ok:
NB: I would not usually publish private messages. However once I was certain that what I was being told was an unsupportable smear, I thought it more ethical to publish the relevant content, although not the identity of the person concerned.
EDIT: UPDATE
Supanova have posted a clarification on their Facebook page. The update is far more accomodating than the Twitter account was today. From comments on there it appears that the matter may be resolved soon.
ADDITIONAL: The Facebook clarification states that the official position is the one on the Facebook page, not on the Twitter account, and that “there is an internal discussion proceeding about the way those messages were communicated on Twitter”
END ADDITIONAL
END EDIT
Queensland’s two most senior Opposition leaders avoided using today’s Estimates hearings to ask the Speaker, John Mickel, about plans to strip him of his power to manage Parliamentary offices and staff. The Speaker appeared before the Queensland Parliament’s Finance and Administration Committee, where Opposition Leader Jeff Seeney and Deputy Opposition Leader Tim Nicholls asked no questions about the plans which Mr Mickel said would undermine the office of Speaker.
The two Opposition leaders asked questions about the effects of the January floods on car parking at the Parliamentary buildings, the dificulty of using iPhones and iPads in Parliamentary offices, accomodation for MPs and a regional sitting of Parliament in Mackay, although Mr Mickel said in his opening remarks he would not be responsible for these matters within a few months.
The government introduced a Bill in June that, when passed, will remove the Speaker’s control over Parliamentary buildings, staff and facilities, and give it to a Committee of the Legislative Assembly dominated by senior Government and Opposition leaders. Mr Mickel has publically opposed these plans, saying in June “The Speaker has effectively been nobbled”. The Bill came after a Parliamentary committee was set up last year to enquire into the way other committees looked at legslation. That committee took an extremely broad view of its terms of reference and recommended that some of the Speaker’s power be transferred to the Department of Public Works, without taking any public evidence on that issue.
